God Bless our #GoodPolice but the #BadCops Have 2 Go!
#NoMorePoliceSexualAbuse
@LivingProof2017ANY POLICE SEX ON DUTY "IN CUSTODY" OR NOT! ALL COP/SEX on the TAXPAYER DIME! MUST BE ILLEGAL⚖PERIOD! END OF SUBJECT! NO COP SEX ON TAXPAYER DIME OR TIME.
Thank You @MarkTreyger718 @chuckschumer @NYGovCuomo @DetKenLang @NYPDnewsFinally There Will Be An End To #PoliceSexualAbuse
WA State @Q13FOX @BillWixey HAS IGNORED @AdamGehrke @gottogetoutof @PattyMurray @ACLU @JayInslee @ACLU_WA @CNN @maddow @Lawrence
'No Fear of Being Caught’ - Many police officials and experts express optimism that the prevalence of cameras will reduce police lying. As officers begin to accept that digital evidence of an encounter will emerge, lying will be perceived as too risky — or so the thinking goes.
“Basically it’s harder for a cop to lie today,” the Police Department’s top legal official, Lawrence Byrne, said last year at a New York City Bar Association event, noting that there were millions of cellphones on the streets of New York, each with a camera. “There is virtually no enforcement encounter where there isn’t immediate video of what the officers are doing.”
Style... Class... Grace.. Charm... Self Respect & Dignity- So sad that all of these are now seen as a punchline, a joke. God forbid a woman is polite, stylish, shows a little class. These days she is ripped apart and mentally beaten to a pulp. Even worse, taken advantage of & abused because she is seen as a pushover- easy to manipulate- not a strong woman. They are WRONG.. Very very wrong!
H-1157.2 HOUSE BILL 1825______State of Washington 63rd Legislature 2013 Regular Session By Representatives Parker, Goodman, Hawkins, Kretz, Kagi, Fagan, and Warnick Read first time 02/11/13. Referred to Committee on Labor & Workforce Development.
1 AN ACT Relating to the removal and discharge of peace officers; 2 amending RCW 41.12.080, 41.14.110, and 43.43.070; and adding a new 3 section to chapter 43.101 RCW. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: 5 Sec. 1. RCW 41.12.080 and 2007 c 218 s 13 are each amended to read 6 as follows: 7 (1) The tenure of everyone holding an office, place, position or 8 employment under the provisions of this chapter shall be only during 9 good behavior, and except as provided in subsection (2) of this 10 section, any such person may be removed or discharged, suspended 11 without pay, demoted, or reduced in rank, or deprived of vacation 12 privileges or other special privileges for any of the following 13 reasons: 14 (((1))) (a) Incompetency, inefficiency or inattention to or 15 dereliction of duty; 16 (((2))) (b) Dishonesty, intemperance, immoral conduct, 17 insubordination, discourteous treatment of the public, or a fellow 18 employee, or any other act of omission or commission tending to injure 19 the public service; or any other willful failure on the part of the p. 1 HB 1825 1 employee to properly conduct himself or herself; or any willful 2 violation of the provisions of this chapter or the rules and regulation 3 to be adopted hereunder; 4 (((3))) (c) Mental or physical unfitness for the position which the 5 employee holds; 6 (((4))) (d) Dishonest, disgraceful, immoral or prejudicial conduct; 7 (((5))) (e) Drunkenness or use of intoxicating liquors, narcotics, 8 or any other habit forming drug, liquid or preparation to such extent 9 that the use thereof interferes with the efficiency or mental or 10 physical fitness of the employee, or which precludes the employee from 11 properly performing the function and duties of any position under civil 12 service; 13 (((6))) (f) Conviction of a felony, or a misdemeanor, involving 14 moral turpitude; 15 (((7))) (g) Any other act or failure to act which in the judgment 16 of the civil service commissioners is sufficient to show the offender 17 to be an unsuitable and unfit person to be employed in the public 18 service. 19 (2) If an employer removes or discharges a person who holds an 20 office, place, position, or employment under this chapter for 21 committing an illegal act or an act of dishonesty or untruthfulness, 22 and an arbitrator finds that the employer established that the person 23 engaged in the act or acts by clear and convincing evidence, the 24 employer is deemed to have had just cause for the removal or discharge, 25 and the arbitrator may not overturn the removal or discharge. 26 (3) For purposes of this section, "illegal act" and an "act of 27 dishonesty or untruthfulness" mean the same as defined in section 4 of 28 this act. 29 Sec. 2. RCW 41.14.110 and 2012 c 117 s 14 are each amended to read 30 as follows: 31 (1) The tenure of every person holding an office, place, position, 32 or employment under the provisions of this chapter shall be only during 33 good behavior, and except as provided in subsection (2) of this 34 section, any such person may be removed or discharged, suspended 35 without pay, demoted, or reduced in rank, or deprived of vacation 36 privileges or other special privileges for any of the following 37 reasons: HB 1825 p. 2 1 (((1))) (a) Incompetency, inefficiency, or inattention to, or 2 dereliction of duty; 3 (((2))) (b) Dishonesty, intemperance, immoral conduct, 4 insubordination, discourteous treatment of the public, or a fellow 5 employee, or any other act of omission or commission tending to injure 6 the public service; or any other willful failure on the part of the 7 employee to properly conduct himself or herself; or any willful 8 violation of the provisions of this chapter or the rules and 9 regulations to be adopted hereunder; 10 (((3))) (c) Mental or physical unfitness for the position which the 11 employee holds; 12 (((4))) (d) Dishonest, disgraceful, or prejudicial conduct; 13 (((5))) (e) Drunkenness or use of intoxicating liquors, narcotics, 14 or any other habit forming drug, liquid, or preparation to such extent 15 that the use thereof interferes with the efficiency or mental or 16 physical fitness of the employee, or which precludes the employee from 17 properly performing the function and duties of any position under civil 18 service; 19 (((6))) (f) Conviction of a felony, or a misdemeanor involving 20 moral turpitude; 21 (((7))) (g) Any other act or failure to act which in the judgment 22 of the civil service commission is sufficient to show the offender to 23 be an unsuitable and unfit person to be employed in the public service. 24 (2) If an employer removes or discharges a person who holds an 25 office, place, position, or employment under this chapter for 26 committing an illegal act or an act of dishonesty or untruthfulness, 27 and an arbitrator finds that the employer established that the person 28 engaged in the act or acts by clear and convincing evidence, the 29 employer is deemed to have had just cause for the removal or discharge, 30 and the arbitrator may not overturn the removal or discharge. 31 (3) For purposes of this section, "illegal act" and an "act of 32 dishonesty or untruthfulness" mean the same as defined in section 4 of 33 this act. 34 Sec. 3. RCW 43.43.070 and 1984 c 141 s 2 are each amended to read 35 as follows: 36 (1) Discharge of any officer with probationary status and 37 discharge, demotion, or suspension of any officer with nonprobationary p. 3 HB 1825 1 status shall be only for cause, which shall be clearly stated in a 2 written complaint, sworn to by the person preferring the charges, and 3 served upon the officer complained of. 4 (2) Removal or discharge of any officer for committing an illegal 5 act or an act of dishonesty or untruthfulness established by clear and 6 convincing evidence shall be deemed to satisfy the reasonableness and 7 lawfulness standard set forth in RCW 43.43.100. 8 (3) Upon being ((so)) served with a written complaint, any such 9 officer shall be entitled to a public hearing before a trial board 10 consisting of two Washington state patrol officers of the rank of 11 captain, and one officer of equal rank with the officer complained of, 12 who shall be selected by the chief of the Washington state patrol by 13 lot from the roster of the patrol. In the case of complaint by an 14 officer, such officer shall not be a member of the trial board. 15 (4) For purposes of this section, "illegal act" and an "act of 16 dishonesty or untruthfulness" mean the same as defined in section 4 of 17 this act. 18 NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. A new section is added to chapter 43.101 RCW 19 to read as follows: 20 (1) If an employer removes or discharges a person who holds an 21 office, place, position, or employment under this chapter for 22 committing an illegal act or an act of dishonesty or untruthfulness, 23 and an arbitrator finds that the employer established that the person 24 engaged in the act or acts by clear and convincing evidence, the 25 employer is deemed to have had just cause for the removal or discharge, 26 and the arbitrator may not overturn the removal or discharge. 27 (2) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the 28 following meanings: 29 (a) "Illegal act" means the commission of a crime involving moral 30 turpitude in the discharge of the person's official duties, including 31 but not limited to: A violent offense, as defined in RCW 9.94A.030; a 32 sex offense, as defined in RCW 9.94A.030; theft, as defined in RCW 33 9A.56.030 through 9A.56.050; fraud under chapter 9A.60 RCW; malicious 34 mischief, as defined in RCW 9A.48.070 through 9A.48.090; and indecent 35 exposure, as defined in RCW 9A.88.010. 36 (b) "An act of dishonesty or untruthfulness" means intentionally HB 1825 p. 4 1 making a false statement in response to a direct question in an 2 official investigation or disciplinary process or intentionally making 3 a false statement in an official public document. 4 NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. If any provision of this act or its 5 application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the 6 remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other 7 persons or circumstances is not affected. p. 5 HB 1825
I JUST FOUND THIS STORY! ALL OF YOU- PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE LINK- WATCH THE VIDEO- HEAR WHAT SHE IS SAYING AND....
Please Hear Her Words!!!
"I think a lot of women suffer this kind of abuse in silence and I'm not one of them" - "I never thought that something like that would happen when I was in custody of the Police with whom I've always Trusted"
Lawsuit: Nassau County cop molested woman during DUI arrest
Jenny Hannigan reported the alleged assault, but the police department’s Internal Affairs Unit closed its investigation last November with an 'undetermined' finding.
At a press conference Monday in Garden City, L.I., Jenny Hannigan made sexual abuse allegations against the Nassau County Police Department.
A Long Island woman has filed a federal lawsuit accusing a Nassau County cop of sexually assaulting her inside a police car.
Jenny Hannigan, 27, says that Officer Gary Zima and his partner, Officer Rachel Miller, stopped her near Hewlett, L.I., in June 2011 on suspicion of drunken driving. She said that when she was handcuffed and placed in a police cruiser, Zima got in the back with her as Miller drove to a police stationhouse.ANDY MARLIN/FOR NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Jenny Hannigan, left, and attorney Amy B. Marion held a press conference Monday regarding Hannigan's federal lawsuit accusing a cop in Nassau County of sexual assault.
“He was close to my body and reached over at some point during the ride … and put his fingers inside of me,” Hannigan said at a news conference Monday. She accused Miller of doing nothing to stop it.
Hannigan reported the assault. The Nassau County Police Department’s Internal Affairs Unit closed its investigation last November with an “undetermined” finding.
A woman who claims that she was sexually abused by a police officer in Island Park, N.Y., has filed a federal lawsuit against him and his partner.
In 2011, officers Rachel Miller and Gary Zima arrested Jenny Hannigan, 27, on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. They handcuffed Hannigan and put her in the back of a squad car, and Zima got in the back seat with her. Hannigan claims that Zima put his hand up her dress while Miller drove back to the station.
“He was close to my body and reached over at some point during the ride … and put his fingers inside of me,” Hannigan said in a news conference Monday, according to the New York Daily News. "I never thought something like this would happen when I was in the custody of the police, whom I have always trusted."
She accuses Miller of doing nothing to help her.
"I was visibly trying to make eye contact with her and felt like she was purposefully not paying attention to what was going on in the back seat," Hannigan said.
Hannigan reported the alleged abuse to the Nassau County Police Internal Affairs following the incident, but they found the allegation to be "undetermined." Zima still with the department, according to WABC.
The suit seeks $150,000 in damages for excessive force as well as violations of Hannigan’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, according to the Long Island Press.
“It’s criminal conduct and yet these officers are not being brought up on charges,” Hannigan's attorney, Amy Marion said Monday, according to the newspaper.
Miss Bren's Law 2014 
Jillian Raftery 
Miss Bren's Law 2014