God Bless our #GoodPolice but the #BadCops Have 2 Go!

SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF LIED TO ME: Nowhere has the Legislature indicated that the sheriff's powers and duties are limited to the unincorporated areas of the county. Nor is there any statutory language from which such a limitation might be inferred. We note, in addition, that the sheriff at common law was the chief law enforcement officer of the county, and that the office of sheriff retains its common law powers and duties unless modified by the constitution or statutes. Sheriffs, Police, and Constables § 2 (1987); seeState ex rel. Johnston v. Melton, 192 Wash. 379, 388-89, 73 P.2d 1334 (1937); AGO 51-53 No. 322 at 2. We thus conclude that the sheriff has a general duty to enforce state law in both unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county. "the jurisdiction of the sheriff in law enforcement matters normally extends throughout his county including the incorporated areas thereof." [The sheriff's] authority is county wide. He is not restricted by municipal limits. For better protection and for the enforcement of local ordinance[s] the [[Orig. Op. Page 4]] cities and towns have their police departments or their town marshals. Even the state has its highway patrol. Still the authority of the sheriff with his correlative duty remains.

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Please Call Your Local WA State Legislator 4-Support of HB1825 - 2015 Legislation

HOUSE BILL 1825 Must be Resurrected & Amended for 2015 Legislation, to also include #PoliceSexualAbuseHOUSE BILL 1825 WILL HELP STOP THE "BAD" POLICE FROM ABUSING US! Sexually & Otherwise. And gain back the public's trust & respect our "Good" Police have earned. Please, WA State Citizens. We need this Bill!
Sponsors: Representatives: 
Rep. Kevin Parker(R)  
Olympia Office: 421 John L. O'Brien Building
PO Box 40600 Olympia, WA 98504-0600
(360) 786-7922
District Office: 10 N Post St Ste 648 Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 455-7225

 2014 Nov. 4 Washington General Election
Spokane voters overwhelmingly called for independent police oversight but city leaders and others say full implementation would be blocked by state labor laws that give final say to employees. What, if any, changes or clarifications should the Legislature consider?

Parker: In 2013, I proposed HB 1825, which allows police departments more management freedom. I worked with Sheriff Knezovich toward an effective policy to protect our police force and found, as voters did, that our arbitration process isn’t perfect. I will continue to work toward a system that provides everyone security.
Dover: It’s pretty clear the citizenry is unhappy with public employees that “game” the system, practically letting them get away with murder. Crafty labor attorneys have found every loophole, and now they need to be closed. We need revised rules that protect good employees, while protecting the citizens from the bad.

HOUSE BILL 1825 Lists many reasons for actions to be taken against a "misconduct" officer. Now it's time for #PoliceSexualAbuse #Assault & #Miscondcuts, to be added to the list & this bill to be put back in front of the Legislators & the House in WA State 2o15 Legislative Session

For Example:
1. Using power of their badge for the Purposes of Sexual Nature 2. Making Threats of ARREST for the Purposes of Sexual Nature! 3. Using Sexual Favors as a "trade off" for NO Criminal Arrest! 4. LYING for the purposes of "Covering Up" Sexual Abuse of our Citizens! 5. POLICE INTIMIDATION for the Purposes of Sexual Nature! 6. Using ANY POLICE Equipment for the Purposes of Sexual Nature!
Officer Robert W Franklin of the Everett WA Police Department is guilty of all of the above & worse. Officer Franklin was given the option of "Resigning" rather than being Fired. Officer Franklin kept his Pension. I happen to be the 2010 "victim" mentioned in this report from King 5 News. This is all untrue. It was in fact the Everett Police (Inspector Pete Grassi) who Threatened to arrest me, Bullied me, Refused to allow me to give my statement outside of the EPD. Eric Stevick of the Everett Herald tried to support me all he could in his report of Officer Robert W. Franklin of the Everett WA Police Department. HB1825 will stop other innocent citizens from suffering as I have & as many many more just like me have.
Please call your WA State Legislators (all legislators) and let them know... We want this Bill to pass! We are sick and tired of Police Abuse- Sexual and otherwise! We are fed up and we want/need HB1825 & Supporting: SB5668 
1825 Washington House Bill

Companion BillSB 5668

History of the Bill as of Wednesday,

December 3, 2014 2:47 PM   

HB 1825 HTML
Bill Subjects: 
Public Services

Sunday, October 26, 2014

#SexualFraud is #LegalRape! Original Blog Post WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Fraud: deliberate deception, trickery, or cheating intended to gain an advantage-

ONLY ONE EXCEPTION: Fraud with intent of Sex...Not a crime!
For all the "Good Men" reading this- Your tax dollars are paying for other men [some, not all of course] to be out there scamming woman after woman for Sex, and leaving them (and the unexpected children) behind for the taxpayers (You) to deal with. Even Worse... Our (only the bad ones) #PoliceOfficers are some of our worst offenders of #SexualFraud #SexualAbuse 

Your hard earned TAX DOLLARS are going to paying for #Pampers #Formula #Medical #Food for babies you did not make & to support the now damaged women you did not abuse. Remember this next time you "Hi-5" your Boyz who Just "Tricked That Bitch" ... YOUR Tax-dollars are paying for it!

1. deliberate deception, trickery, or cheating intended to gain an advantage-
2. an act or instance of such deception
3. something false or spurious his explanation was a fraud
4. Informal a person who acts in a false or deceitful way

He's broken no laws and by now just moved on to the next one! 
I for one would like to see this change!!
In a Multimillion dollar Network Sitcom, this may be humorous, entertaining, and bring in Millions in profits to the networks.  In real life this and long term fraud for sex, is a Multimillion Dollar Production for the Taxpayers- And does Not bring in Millions in Profits to the states!

For all the Ladies:
By Law a Man Can Not hold you down and force Sex on you. A Man Can Not hold a gun to your head and force Sex on you. A Man Can Not use any weapon of any kind to threaten you, and force Sex on you. A Man Can Not force Sex on you when you say NO!

However Ladies- If that same Man can get you to believe every lie coming out of his mouth, believe every scam he's running on you, fall for every trick and game in the book so that he can get Sex from you, [and for as long as he wants in many cases] that is 100% LEGAL! You are now free game!

He can "Legally" Violate you every day and twice on Sundays! He may live off you, he may mentally abuse you to hide his FRAUD, he does not legally, have to tell you his "Real" name. 

It's Legal Ladies.. Fraud for Money is a Criminal Offence over a State Set Dollar Amount- Felony in many cases. However, Fraud for "Sex" with damages that leave a woman on taxpayer support, w/a child, and damaged for life- Not a Criminal Offence. It's just too bad so sad for you because you, were in a "Relationship" Consensual Sex. 

Oh No You Were Not!! You were scammed! Lied To for Sex- Legally Raped! Sexual Fraud- If you weren't, then why are you even at the DSHS office? Moreover, where is the father? NO Laws have been broken! There is nothing you can do ladies- He's committed no crime! The Law Cannot even stop that Man from moving right on to the next innocent woman-And most do!


I feel that If the states were able to press criminal charges, this would keep the Man who left a Woman and Child on Taxpayer support, in that state.

This would eliminate the use of tax dollars chasing that man down for DSHS Child/Mother Support restitution, and gives the state a better chance of that Man, not the taxpayers, being held accountable for that Mother and Child~ And again, there is a darn good chance that same Man (and others) will think twice before he commits Fraud with the intent of Sex again!

Doing the research now on how much in tax dollars (WA State for my research) are spent to hunt down and collect DSHS child support restitution from the noncompliance. 
Furthermore, how much (If the noncompliant is even found) is actually collected and paid back to DSHS or the mother and child, compared to how much tax money was spent just locating the noncompliant parent.

Division of Child Support


Despite recent record improvements in paternity establishment and child support collections, much more needs to be done to ensure that all children born out-of-wedlock have paternity established and that all non-custodial parents provide financial support for their children. Currently, only about one-half of the custodial parents due child support receive full payment. About twenty-five percent receive partial payment and twenty-five percent receive nothing.
In an effort to strengthen and improve state child support enforcement activities, several federal laws were passed, including a national new-hire reporting system.

These laws required states to pass uniform interstate child support laws, automate enforcement actions, and provide for tougher noncompliance penalties, such as driver's license revocation.

 If you would like DCS to consider referral to the U.S. Attorney for Federal Criminal Non-support referral, contact your DCS Support Enforcement Officer or DCS Central Operations.

Ladies- This is the definition of Criminal Rape:

Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse, which is initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority or with a person who is incapable of valid consent, such as a person who is unconscious or incapacitated The term is most often defined in criminal law.

This is the definition of Criminal Fraud:

In criminal law, a fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and also a civil law violation. Defrauding people or entities of money or valuables is a common purpose of fraud. 
distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things even though there is, in fact, no actual difference.[1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Open letter to Chief Of Seattle, Kathleen O'Toole. RE: Police Sexual Misconducts SPD and Washington State.


Published On February 17, 2011 | By Paula Parmeley Carter | Articles

According to the 3rd Quarter Report of The National Police Misconduct Statistics and Reporting Project, police officers were accused of sexual assault at a rate of 79 per 100,000 law enforcement personal. The rate of accusations for the general public is 28.7 per 100,000 general public.  When corrected for gender these numbers tell us that there are 1.5 times more accusations of sexual assualt among  male law enforcement officers than among the general male population.  The fact that rapists seem to be concentrated among a group of armed individuals who have the purported authority to detain and arrest other individuals should be more than a little alarming for even the most prolific police bootlicker. In just the last month, several stories of officers committing disgusting crimes have been in the news.
Read More Here 
Open letter to Chief Of Seattle, Kathleen O'Toole. RE: Police Sexual Misconducts SPD and Washington State.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:48 PM, O'Toole, Kathleen <Kathleen.OToole@seattle.gov> wrote:


Thanks very much for your message. Rest assured, I plan to hold members of the SPD accountable for ALL forms of misconduct. My top priority is to restore community trust. In order to do that we must demonstrate that we have an effective and transparent disciplinary system.

Again, thanks for bringing your concerns to my attention.
Kathleen O'Toole

July 22, 2014 Kathleen O’Toole Chief of Police Seattle PD
Cc: Mayor Ed Murray, Represenitives Sells, Goodman, Parker, Hope. Q13 Fox News Seattle, Eric Stevick The Everett Herald, Everett Attorney Ramsey Ramerman. Washington State Govoner Officer Philip Debous. Our ATG, Office of Secretary of State. WA State Police Union.

Sent Via: Email & USPS
RE: Police Sexual Misconducts SPD and Washington State

Dear Chief O’Toole.

Hello, Chief O'Toole I hope this finds you well. I am writing you with much concern for our innocent citizens, now the survivors of P.S.M -Police Sexual Misconducts, and with great hope that you, as Chief of the Seattle Police Department, would consider publically denouncing the behavior of P.S.M within the Seattle Police Department and all Washington State PD's.

I also hope that you will consider implementing a “Zero Tolerance” for any Sexual Misconducts/Crimes of any nature within the SPD Policies And Procedures handbooks and manuals. My hope, Chief O’Toole, is that if you were to start things moving towards a “Zero Tolerance” of any P.S.M within the SPD, over time all Washington State Police Departments will follow your leadership and do the same.

As you are aware, there have been a few new public cases of P.S.M within the Seattle Police Department recently. Many have been very disturbing to say the least. The few cases of P.S.M that do become public do not tell the entire story of this underground couture of Badge-Power-Intimidation-Sex within our police departments across our own state of Washington, and our nation.

As the survivor of many forms of sexual abuse in my life, and now P.S.M , I can honestly say that sexual abuse of any kind is bad enough. But when a Police Officer uses their badge and authority to abuse (any form of abuse) it is traumatizing in ways that words can never fully express.

I feel it is time to openly discuss the issue of Police Sexual Misconduct so that we can protect any further citizens from P.S.M. I respect the DOJ and the SPD for all the hard work being done to “reform” a culture of “Excessive Force” and “Racial Discrimination.” However it is not a secret that we have a very serious issue in Washington State and the Nation of our Police using their badges and power over the citizens with the intent of Sexual gratifications.

In closing, Chief O’Toole, I would like to congratulate you on becoming Seattle’s First female Chief, and I have no doubts your skills and experience will show everyone in our Beautiful state of Washington, that Man or Woman, you are the right person for the job.

Again, thank you Chief O’Toole. I do hope you will take this all to heart and give it great consideration.

Sent with best regards

Updated 5:10 pm, Friday, March 13, 2015
Chief Kathleen O'Toole fired a Seattle police officer Thursday for attempting romantic relationships with women he met during the course of his police work last summer.
Patrol officer Peter Leutz, an officer of 10 years, engaged in "repeating and escalating misconduct" by calling and texting women whose phone numbers and home addresses he acquired during routine police calls, according to his disciplinary action report.
"This was serious and repeated abuse of authority, and an unsettling pattern of behavior," O'Toole wrote in the disciplinary report. "... The damage to the public trust in this department from this type of behavior cannot be overstated."
The same officer shot a teen in the leg in 2007 during a Central District incident. In that case, a 13-year-old boy reached for an object during a police interaction that Leutz thought to possibly be a firearm. It was a cell phone.
Office of Professional Accountability investigations uncovered the following incidents from last year:
July 17, 2014: Leutz responded to a report of a stolen bike. After the contact with the female victim ended, he texted her days later using the phone number he collected in the police report. After she ignored him, he called her to ask her to meet him socially, but she declined.

  • The woman did not file an OPA complaint, but investigators learned of this interaction while investigating subsequent incidents involving Leutz.

    The woman reportedly expressed being troubled by the officer's conduct.
  • Aug. 4, 2014: Leutz responded to a domestic disturbance call at a residence in the city. A woman and her boyfriend reportedly argued and the woman spent the night outside their apartment waiting to be let back in to see their infant child, according to police documents.

    Police determined that no crime had occurred, but Leutz left a domestic violence information pamphlet with the woman.

    Within hours, Leutz called the woman on his personal cell and asked her to get coffee with him. During the next three days, he sent her multiple text messages containing comments calling her "cute and sassy" and remarking that he wanted to "hug and comfort" her. Leutz also asked her again to meet him for lunch or coffee and urged her to end her relationship with her boyfriend.
  • Aug. 10, 2014: Leutz performed a traffic stop on a woman's vehicle and issued a warning.

    About 40 minutes later, he drove to the woman's house in his patrol car and during his shift, having obtained her home address during the stop.

    He gave the woman his personal cell phone number. The woman later told OPA investigators she contacted him at the urging of a friend who encouraged her to get a police officer "on her side," reports say.

    Leutz sent the woman at least 109 text messages to the woman during the next 39 days - "it appears she sent far less in return," records indicate.

    Reports say that most of the exchange took place after Leutz was aware that the previous woman he texted filed a complaint against him for similar behavior.

    Leutz's text messages complimented the woman's looks, asked her "did u feel something when we locked eyes" and requested multiple times to meet her in person.

    She told Leutz she was separating from her husband, to which Leutz responded with more requests to see her and, "say yes! Go for it...I am!"

    The disciplinary report also says Leutz referenced his status as a police officer during times the woman expressed decreased interest in him. At one time, she asked: "am I just some dumb ol' cop to you."
Leutz reportedly admitted to "really unprofessional" behavior.
O'Toole wrote to him, "I do not have sufficient trust in your judgment or faith in your future conduct to ever send you back into the field as a police officer."Leutz earned an annual salary of $93,855 in 2014.