God Bless our #GoodPolice but the #BadCops Have 2 Go!

SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF LIED TO ME: Nowhere has the Legislature indicated that the sheriff's powers and duties are limited to the unincorporated areas of the county. Nor is there any statutory language from which such a limitation might be inferred. We note, in addition, that the sheriff at common law was the chief law enforcement officer of the county, and that the office of sheriff retains its common law powers and duties unless modified by the constitution or statutes. Sheriffs, Police, and Constables § 2 (1987); seeState ex rel. Johnston v. Melton, 192 Wash. 379, 388-89, 73 P.2d 1334 (1937); AGO 51-53 No. 322 at 2. We thus conclude that the sheriff has a general duty to enforce state law in both unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county. "the jurisdiction of the sheriff in law enforcement matters normally extends throughout his county including the incorporated areas thereof." [The sheriff's] authority is county wide. He is not restricted by municipal limits. For better protection and for the enforcement of local ordinance[s] the [[Orig. Op. Page 4]] cities and towns have their police departments or their town marshals. Even the state has its highway patrol. Still the authority of the sheriff with his correlative duty remains.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

The "Meaning Of Life" By Al Esparza 05-2015

The "Meaning Of Life"
By Al Esparza 05-2015
I think the reason this touches me so much is "In Lieu of Reward"
 And"Faced with the choices of the easy path,
versus 
the difficult one .
 I respect that~

Miss Bren's Law March 13, 2013
The Plaintiff Fighting for the better of others not just themselves is
“The True Plaintiff”

~The Plaintiff Fighting for Truth not Money- Is the True Plaintiff what 
Our Courts are for-

~The Plaintiff Fighting for Justice not Money- Is the True Plaintiff what 
Our Courts are for-

~The Plaintiff Fighting for Respect of the Law Not Money- Is the True Plaintiff what
Our Courts are for-


~The Plaintiff Fighting for Awareness/Change from their own Pain- Is the True Plaintiff What Our Courts are for

The Defendant who uses all of the above & the good lawyers, to once again, take no  responsibility for their own behavior is Not what our laws and Courts were Ever meant  for & What makes the True Plaintiff ~True~

These People Don't Dream about being rich!
"How did you do this!?" 
Seeing as I have NO Brains or a Legal Expertise 
I just went out there and performed 634 Sexual Favors.
~I'm really quite tired~


The case alleged contamination of drinking water with hexavalent chromium (also written as "chromium VI", "Cr-VI" or "Cr-6") in the southern California town of Hinkley. At the center of the case was a facility called the Hinkley Compressor Station, part of a natural gas pipeline connecting to the San Francisco Bay Area and constructed in 1952. Between 1952 and 1966, PG&E used hexavalent chromium to fight corrosion in the cooling tower. The wastewater dissolved the hexavalent chromium from the cooling towers and was discharged to unlined ponds at the site. Some of the wastewater percolated into the groundwater, affecting an area near the plant approximately 2 by 1 miles (3.2 by 1.6 km).[6] The case was settled in 1996 for US$333 million, the largest settlement ever paid in a direct action lawsuit in US history. Brockovich's law firm received 133.6 million dollars of this settlement, and Brockovich herself received a two million dollar bonus from the action.[citation needed]
A study released in 2010 by the California Cancer Registry showed that cancer rates in Hinkley "remained unremarkable from 1988 to 2008."[7] An epidemiologist involved in the study said that "the 196 cases of cancer reported during the most recent survey of 1996 through 2008 were less than what he would expect based on demographics and the regional rate of cancer."[7]
Average Cr-6 levels in Hinkley were recorded as 1.19ppb with a peak of 3.09ppb. The PG&E Topock Compressor Station averaged 7.8ppb and peaks at 31.8ppb based on the PG&E Background Study.[8] California's Public Health Goal (PHG), circa 2011, for hexavalent chromium is 0.02ppb.[9]